A verdict backed by real evidence.
Describe your project and Scoutr cross-references Reddit, Hacker News, search demand and competitor revenue. You get BUILD, VALIDATE or KILL with the receipts attached, not an opinion.
Illustrative example
Every project in one hub.
Each diagnosed project keeps its verdict, fit score and signals. Compare them side by side and decide which one deserves your next sprint.
Illustrative example
Model the MVP with an agent that cuts scope.
The agent drafts your features from the validated report and sorts them into core, nice-to-have and out-of-scope, with a written reason for every call. Its whole job is stopping scope creep.
Illustrative example
Hand off a spec your coding agent can execute.
One click assembles features, acceptance criteria and rationale into a build-ready spec you paste straight into Claude Code, Codex or Cursor.
So, what are we validating?
First full analysis free · Sign-in required · No card
What Scoutr would tell you about these ideas.
Three possible verdicts, with the reason attached. Notice the KILLs: Scoutr also tells you when not to build.
AI Rust tutor for senior devs
Real demand and a viable beachhead; validate pricing with 5 conversations first.
AI meeting notetaker
The pain is real but already served: notetakers ship bundled with meeting platforms.
Pet adoption matchmaker
Strong emotional pull, weak willingness to pay; run the next two experiments before building.
CRM for indie therapists
Painful manual billing workflows and no dominant tool in the niche.
Crypto-tax helper for freelancers
Shrinking search demand and a compliance surface one person can't maintain.
Async retro tool for remote teams
Clear complaint threads, crowded space; differentiation hypothesis still unproven.
Illustrative examples
Hey, I'm the founder. I built scoutr by myself after watching two of my own projects die because nobody actually wanted them. This is the discovery work I wish I'd done first. If you ever get stuck or want to argue with a verdict, message me.
@tomiprod_Build with evidence,
not intuition.
Your first full analysis is free. Then: Starter at $5, Pro to iterate seriously, Studio to run multiple projects in parallel.
Starter
- 1 full discovery report per month
- 100 AI credits to challenge the report
- Reddit + HN + Brave demand signals
- Solution-problem match score (% fit)
- Verdict: BUILD / VALIDATE / KILL
- MVP workspace: model features + export the spec
Pro
- 5 full discovery reports per month
- 600 AI credits per month
- Iteration log: comments + AI reviews per report
- Dashboard with all your validated projects
- MVP workspace + AI scoping agent on every project
- One-click spec handoff to Claude / Codex / Cursor
Studio
- Everything in Pro, plus:
- 20 full discovery reports per month
- 1,500 AI credits per month
- Built for parallel projects
Need more reports than your plan? $5 per additional report.
Need more than 20 reports/month or volume pricing? Email tom@scoutr.dev →
AI suggests, you validate with humans. Build with evidence instead of hope.
Got questions?
Founder reads on idea validation and discovery
Thirty minutes of validation beats three months of building.
Describe your project and see the evidence for yourself. The preview is free.